Good afternoon, poors

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 10/09/2018 at 16:08 • Filed to: None

1

23

WilliamsSW > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 16:14

3

There are those who think they rule the world , and those who actually do:

KingT- 60% of the time, it works every time > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 16:17

1

Does it come with a lifetime supply of Grey Poupon?

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > WilliamsSW 10/09/2018 at 16:24

1

I was gonna go with a 600 but I liked this picture. But you make an excellent point 

Goggles Pizzano > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 16:25

0

Good afternoon.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Goggles Pizzano 10/09/2018 at 16:26

0

Ok, I want to learn something knew today. What is this?

Tapas > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 16:27

2

We’re all jpeg rich, irl poor.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Tapas 10/09/2018 at 16:27

1

Relatable

jimz > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 16:28

2

that reminds me, I have to increase my monocle budget. 

Goggles Pizzano > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 16:33

2

Lotec Ambassadeur Biturbo. Mercedes W126 based.

AuthiCooper1300 > WilliamsSW 10/09/2018 at 16:34

0

Those who actually do tend to favour less flashy cars than a 600 Pullman. Which, on the other hand, was the conveyance of choice for a myriad of cruel and ridiculous dictators propped up by c e r t a i n i n d i v i d u a l s who wouldn’t be seen dead in one.

MonkeePuzzle > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 16:35

1

anyone can be rich enough to buy an old car, to be really rich you had to modify it and drive it like it’s no more valuable than an old civic

AuthiCooper1300 > Goggles Pizzano 10/09/2018 at 16:41

3

F i r s t - g e n e r a t i o n Citroën GS rear light clusters.

WilliamsSW > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 16:41

1

They’re all to rich for us anyways.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Goggles Pizzano 10/09/2018 at 16:42

1

I want one 

WilliamsSW > AuthiCooper1300 10/09/2018 at 16:43

0

I was referring to the Beatles and Eric Clapton tbh

AuthiCooper1300 > WilliamsSW 10/09/2018 at 16:52

1

Sorry I took you so seriously, but most owners of G r össer MBs seem to be excellent examples of w h a t a r a t h e r f a m o u s m a n c a l l e d t h e “dark and lamentable catalogue of human crime”.

The Fab Four buying Pullmans doesn’t surprise me in the least, but. . . Clapton? Hopefully it was the SWB one. I t a l m o s t m a n a g e s t o l o o k e l e g a n t , albeit i n a s o m b e r , s i n i ster w a y.

WilliamsSW > AuthiCooper1300 10/09/2018 at 16:56

1

Yeah, that was kinda the joke, really. Of the Beatles, I think only half the band owned one (don’t think Paul did).

Generally speaking, the Landaulets and LWB cars were mostly owned by shitheels.  The SWB cars are more of a mixed bag - more of those found their way into the hands of “normal” people.  Relatively speaking.

WilliamsSW > MonkeePuzzle 10/09/2018 at 16:58

0

needs moar camber and to be dropped about 3 feet

AuthiCooper1300 > WilliamsSW 10/09/2018 at 17:03

0

Indeed, “ n o r m a l ” p e o p l e . R e l a t i v e l y s p e a k i n g is an excellent way to refer to former SWB owner Jack Nicholson.

WilliamsSW > AuthiCooper1300 10/09/2018 at 17:07

2

Well, compared to Francois Duvalier, Idi Amin, Kim Il-Sung, and Nicolae Ceausescu, he is...

wkiernan > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 17:15

1

My other camper is a Buick :

fintail > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 10/09/2018 at 17:41

1

T his modern car is from 1972.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > MonkeePuzzle 10/09/2018 at 23:05

0

anyone can be rich tasteful enough to buy an old car, to be really rich tacky you had to modify it and drive it like it’s no more valuable than an old civic